On May 28, 2018, I spoke about Designs and Trade Secrets at the 2018 Technology Law Spring Forum of the Canadian Technology Law Association. A copy of my slide presentation is available on request.
On May 17, 2018, I co-ordinated a session on IoT (the Internet of Things) and on Block Chain Technologies at the Spring Meeting of the American Intellectual Property Lawyers Association in Seattle.
I have just finished chairing and co-authoring the AIPPI Canada Group report on Partial Designs. A copy of this report will published on the AIPPI website or I can provide a copy on request.
In May 2017 I reported on the trial decision of Mr. Justice Russell, in The Governors of the University of Alberta and Alberta Health Services v.
Post sale rights post Lexmark. Implications for U.S. and foreign patent owners and licensees.
The Supreme Court disallows post sale restrictions
The Supreme Court of the United States in Lexmark v. Impression Products 581 U.S. 1523 (2017) May 30, 2017 has disallowed any patent post sale restrictions following the sale of a patented article from the patent owner or any licensee from the patent owner.
Claim Interpretation and Patent Infringement
What’s the big deal?
It’s only words, and as lawyers we are used to reading words.
Words inherently imprecise.
If it’s a contract we try to look at surrounding circumstances to see what the parties intended?
Can we do that in a patent specification?
Does it matter what the inventor intended? If not way not?
A patent claim has a public function. It is not a matter of interpreting the party’s intention.